Chhattar Singh @ Chhatrapal Sahu v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/21/2022 · 2025-03-11
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1087 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1087 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:12004
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 21 of 2022 1 - Chhattar Singh @ Chhatrapal Sahu Son Of Uttara Kumar Sahu Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Datrenga, Janpad Panchayat Dharsiva, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur
Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Dharsiva, District Raipur. 4 - Gram Panchayat Datrenga District Raipur (C.G.), Through - Its Sarpanch. 5 - Smt. Deepa Rajak Wife Of Anil Rajak, House No. 17, Sejbahara, Datrenga, Janpad Panchayat Dharsiva, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.03.12 17:30:53 +0530
2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.D. Kuldeep, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ritesh Giri, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Ramesh Nayak, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge
Order on Board 11/03/2025
1. By the present petition, the petitioner is questioning the notice dated 8-12-2021 issued by the Gram Panchayat Datrenga, Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4 would submit that the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable against the notice issued by the Gram Panchayat whereas the petitioner can avail the remedy under Section 91 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993.
3. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents.
4. Having considered the entire facts situation of the case and particularly considering the fact that there is an alternative remedy under Section 91 of the Adhiniyam, 1993, the present petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to avail the remedy as may be available to her within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order. If the petitioner files an appeal along with an application for grant of interim relief, if any, within the stipulated period, till decision of the said interim application by the appellate authority, the interim order dated 5-1-2022 passed by this
3 Court shall remain operative.
5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru)
Judge Amardeep