APHC010124352019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5478/2019 Between: 1. S SALEEM, S/O. MAQBUL SAHIB, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDENTS OF ANAPAGUTTA, NEAR CHANDRA COLONY, NEERUGATTUVARIPALLE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. S. AHMED BASHA @ MUNNA,, S/O. MAQBUL SAHIB, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.4-20-4- E2, KRISHNA NAGAR, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. SHAIK RAHMATHJAN,, W/O. HYDERVALLI AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,RESIDENTS OF ANAPAGUTTA, NEAR CHANDRA COLONY, NEERUGATTUVARIPALLE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. SHAIK TAFIQ, S/O. HYDER VALLI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,RESIDENTS OF ANAPAGUTTA, NEAR CHANDRA COLONY, NEERUGATTUVARIPALLE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. SHAIK KHADER VALLI @ ATIQ AHMAD,, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDENTS OF ANAPAGUTTA, NEAR CHANDRA COLONY, NEERUGATTUVARIPALLE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. SHAIK ALTAF, S/O. HYDER VALLI, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, RESIDENTS OF ANAPAGUTTA, NEAR CHANDRA COLONY, NEERUGATTUVARIPALLE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 7. S. HASEEMA, W/O. ALI BABU. AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,RESIDENTS OF ANAPAGUTTA, NEAR CHANDRA COLONY, NEERUGATTUVARIPALLE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. S. ZAREENA, W/O. TAQUFIQ, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,RESIDENTS OF ANAPAGUTTA, NEAR CHANDRA COLONY, NEERUGATTUVARIPALLE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. S. SHAHEENA, W/O. MUSTHAQ, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,RESIDENTS OF ANAPAGUTTA, NEAR CHANDRA COLONY, NEERUGATTUVARIPALLE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 10. S. ZAMEERUN, W/O. LATE GHOUSE, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,RESIDENTS OF ANAPAGUTTA, NEAR CHANDRA COLONY, NEERUGATTUVARIPALLE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 11. S. FAROOQ, S/O. LATE GHOUSE, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,RESIDENTS OF ANAPAGUTTA, NEAR CHANDRA COLONY, NEERUGATTUVARIPALLE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 12. S.SHAMA, D/O. LATE GHOUSE, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS,RESIDENTS OF ANAPAGUTTA, NEAR CHANDRA COLONY, NEERUGATTUVARIPALLE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 13. S.SADIQUN,, D/O. LATE GHOUSE, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,RESIDENTS OF ANAPAGUTTA, NEAR CHANDRA COLONY, NEERUGATTUVARIPALLE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. TEH STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR , CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE/STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. SHAIK AZHARA BEE, W/O. LATE SYED SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 220, 13TH WARD, THOTTI VEEDHI (GHOUSIA STREET), MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. SHAIK DADA PEER, , S/O. LATE SYED SAHIB, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 220, 13TH WARD, THOTTI VEEDHI (GHOUSIA STREET), MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. D KODANDARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. CHETLURU SREENIVAS The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5478 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 and 3 in calling the petitioners to II Town Police Station, Madanapalli, Chittoor District and insisting not to interfere in the suit schedule properties Ac.3-01 cents in Survey No.557 of B.K. Palli Village, Madanapalli Municipal area Chittoor District as illegal, improper and unjust and consequently direct the Respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere in civil matters and pass…” 2. Heard learned counsel representing Sri D.Kodanda Rami Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the dispute in the case is civil dispute. Therefore, police will not interfere in the matter. 4. The submissions made by the Assistant Government Pleader for Home are placed on record that it is a civil dispute and police will not interfere in such civil disputes. 5. In that view of the matter, this Court is of the considered opinion that no further orders are required in the Writ Petition. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 5 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 01.08.2025 Pmk 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:5478 OF 2019 Date: 01.08.2025 Pmk