403 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA RAMPHAL ALIAS RAMPHAL YADAV NOW DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Bhim Singh, Mr. R.D. Sharma, DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA 1. Prayer in the present civil revision petition is for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the execution application bearing CIS No. LAC EXE Haryana” in LA case No.787 of 2016 dated 13.05.2024, bound manner period. 2. Admittedly, land measuring estate of Village acquired for the purpose, namely, No.8 for smooth movement of traffic near the entry point to industrial Model Township, Manesar and for construction Manesar to Gurugram 09.01.2012, whereby, compensation to the tune of Rs.75,00,000/ 3. Feeling dissatisfied, the petitioners petition under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: RAMPHAL ALIAS RAMPHAL YADAV NOW DECEASED THROUGH S AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Bhim Singh, Advocate for the Mr. R.D. Sharma, DAG, Haryana. **** H MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present civil revision petition is for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the execution application bearing CIS No. LAC EXE-364 of 2024, titled as “Ramphal and Others vs. State of ana” in LA case No.787 of 2016 dated 13.05.2024, bound manner period. Admittedly, land measuring 8 kanals 1 marla estate of Village Bas Haria, Tehsil Manesar, District Gurugram acquired for the purpose, namely, for development of National Highway No.8 for smooth movement of traffic near the entry point to industrial Model Township, Manesar and for construction Manesar to Gurugram-Pataudi Road followed by an award dated , whereby, the Land Acquisition Collector, compensation to the tune of Rs.75,00,000/- per acre. Feeling dissatisfied, the petitioners petition under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-7258-2024 Date of Decision: May 13, 2025 RAMPHAL ALIAS RAMPHAL YADAV NOW DECEASED THROUGH ........Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.D. Sharma, DAG, Haryana. Prayer in the present civil revision petition is for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the execution application bearing “Ramphal and Others vs. State of ana” in LA case No.787 of 2016 dated 13.05.2024, within a time 1 marla situated in the revenue Bas Haria, Tehsil Manesar, District Gurugram was development of National Highway No.8 for smooth movement of traffic near the entry point to industrial Model Township, Manesar and for construction of road link from IMT followed by an award dated the Land Acquisition Collector, Gurugram awarded per acre. Feeling dissatisfied, the petitioners-landowners filed reference petition under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity, 2024 May 13, 2025 Prayer in the present civil revision petition is for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the execution application bearing “Ramphal and Others vs. State of within a time situated in the revenue was development of National Highway No.8 for smooth movement of traffic near the entry point to industrial road link from IMT followed by an award dated awarded landowners filed reference TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.05.16 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-7258-2024 -2- “1894 Act”) for enhancement of the compensation, which was allowed while enhancing the compensation amount to Rs.93,77,500/- per acre along with all statutory consequential benefits vide award dated 16.05.2022. 3.1 Thereafter, the petitioners-landowners filed execution application CIS No. LAC EXE-364 of 2024, titled as “Ramphal and Others vs. State of Haryana” in LA case No.787 of 2016 dated 13.05.2024 before the Executing Court, Gurugram, but till date the payment has not been released to the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners being aggrieved of the delay has filed the present revision petition for issuance of direction to the Executing Court concerned to decide the execution petition expeditiously, in a time bound manner. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel representing the respondents is not in a position to controvert the aforesaid facts. 6. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper-book. 7. A perusal of record shows that execution petition (Annexure P- 2) filed by the petitioners on 13.05.2024, is still pending and the petitioners are waiting to get full amount of compensation on the basis of decision dated 16.05.2022 passed by the Reference Court. 8. In “Rahul S. Shah Vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi and others” (2021) 6 SCC 418, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held as follows:- “That the executing Court must dispose of execution proceeding within 6 months from the date of filing which may be extended only by recording reasons in writing for such delay.” TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.05.16 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-7258-2024 -3- 9. In view of the aforementioned legal position, the Executing Court is requested to dispose of the execution petition CIS No. LAC EXE-364 of 2024, titled as “Ramphal and Others vs. State of Haryana” in LA case No.787 of 2016 dated 13.05.2024 as expeditiously as possible on the date fixed i.e. 19.05.2025 or within two months thereafter, as any further delay may cause serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioners-land owners. 10. It is made clear that nothing stated herein-above shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the execution proceedings. 11. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. 13.05.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.05.16 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document