SAKENDRA URAON ALIAS SIKENDRA ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3064/2025 · 2025-04-21
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10864 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10864 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:11773] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3064 of 2025
------ Sakendra Uraon @ Sikendra Oraon, aged about 20 years son of Kameshwar Uraon Resident of village Kutti P.O. and police station- Simariya, District- Chatra .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No.02 Dated- 21-04-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Simariya P.S. Case No.18 of 2025 registered under Section 308 (3) and 308 (4) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that a pamphlet was posted in the campus of the informant/company demanding levy and a mobile number was mentioned in the said pamphlet and on investigation, the name of the petitioner transpired being the owner of the said mobile number and the petitioner confessed before the police that on the instigation of his brother-in-law, he participated in demanding levy from the informant/company. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, have already been released on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide
order dated 09.04.2025 passed in B.A. No.2819 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant/company in any manner during the trial of the case and will not go to or near the said
company during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.01.2025 as is evident from para-15 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M, Chatra in connection with Simariya P.S. Case No.18 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant/company in any manner during the trial of the case and will not go to or near the said company during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/