[2025:RJ-JP:24354] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3572/2025 Chandra Mohan Alias Chandu S/o Ghansi Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Digodpaar, Police Station Kishanganj, District Baran (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Baran.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5065/2025 Tejpal S/o Dharam Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Chandliya Police Station Kishanganj, District Baran. (Accused Presently Confined At Central Jail Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal Mr. Bhim Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 03/07/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0007/2025 registered at Police Station-Kishanganj, District-Baran for the offence under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act. 2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned [2025:RJ-JP:24354] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3572/2025] Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the present petitioner-Chandra Mohan Alias Chandu. So called recovery made from another accused relates to below the commercial quantity. The petitioner Chandra Mohan Alias Chandu is involved in this case only on the statement of another accused-Tejpal, according to which, he has received contraband from the present petitioner-Chandra Mohan Alias Chandu. He again submits that the petitioners are behind the Bars since 23.01.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Chandra Mohan Alias Chandu S/o Ghansi Lal (2) Tejpal S/o Dharam Singh shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond [2025:RJ-JP:24354] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3572/2025] in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/66-67