Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10860 (HP)

Madan lal v. Bhima devi

CRMP/1235/2025 · 2025-04-04

Ranjan Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Madan Lal versus Bhima Devi Criminal Revision No.73 of 2025 04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rocky, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Cr.M.P. No.1235 of 2025 Instant application has been filed by the applicant/petitioner [Madan Lal], under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking extension of time to comply with the orders dated 11.02.2025 whereby, the applicant-petitioner was directed to deposit an additional 30% of the entire compensation amount [cheque amount and compensation thereof], in addition to the amount already deposited; and furnishing the personal bond and surety bond to the tune of Rs.50,000/- within four weeks from 11.02.2025. The period of four weeks has already elapsed on 11.03.2025. 2. Perusal of Paras 3 and 4 of the application indicates that the applicant has applied for the loan and intends to comply with the orders and deposit the necessary amount and furnish the requisite personal bond and surety bond also. The application is supported by an affidavit also. 3. Upon listing of this application, Mr. Rocky, Advocate has put in appearance, on behalf of the non-applicant-respondent No.1. Learned Counsel for the non-applicant/respondent states that he has no objection, with the prayer for extension of time in the instant application. 4. Taking into account the entirety of the facts and circumstances and averments made in the application, the instant application is allowed and the applicant-petitioner [Madan Lal] is directed to comply with the orders dated 11.02.2025 within two weeks from today. The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. Cr. Revision No.73 of 2025 List the matter after two weeks, before appropriate Bench. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 4th April, 2025 (himani)