GARLANKA LAKSHMI RAJESWARI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRP/1216/2025 · 2025-09-18
R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10856 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10856 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010124282025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1216/2025 Between:
1. GARLANKA LAKSHMI RAJESWARI, W/0 LATE GARLANKA BHASKAR RAO, AGED 44 IN YEARS OCC . HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO.1-127, OLD AGANAMPUDI VILLAGE, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. GARLANKA MURALI,, S/O LATE GARLANKA BHASKAR RAO, AGED 24 YEARS, OCC . AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO.1-127, OLD AGANAMPUDI VILLAGE, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF TASHILDAR, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. KARRI VIJAYALAXMI, W/0 SATYANARAYANA, AGED 58 YEARS .CULTIVATION, R/O VEPULAVEEDHI, ANAKAPALLI MUNICIPALITY, ANAKAPALLI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. KARRI CHANDRAMATHI, W/0 SANYASI, AGED 56 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O KAPU VEEDI, YELLAMANCHILLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ( RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES IN THE PRESENT CRP)
2
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toMemorandum of Civil Revision Petition having been aggrieved by the inaction of the court below in disposing the I. A. No. 961/2022 and I.A. N0.318/2023 IN A.S.No. /2023on the file of the XIII Additional District Judge Gajuwaka IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to. direct the XIII Additional District Judge, Gajuwaka, to dispose of the LA.No. 961 / 2022 and I.A.No. 318/2023 In A.S.No of 2023 as expeditiously as possible pending disposal of the above revision and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. S APPADHARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. 3
The Court made the following Order:
The petitioner herein had filed O.S.No.262 of 2007, before the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka, for declaration of rights and title of 10 acres of land situated, in Sy.Nos.157/2 & 157/4 of Aganampudi Grama-Panchayat, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interference with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property of the petitioner herein. This suit came to be allowed, on 01.03.2016.
Thereafter, the petitioner approached this Court, by way of W.P.No.6309 of 2022, contending that the land of the petitioner is being continued in the list of property, in the prohibitory register maintained under Section-22(A) of the Registration Act, 1908 and for a direction to the respondents therein to delete the same from the said register on account of the decree and judgment, dated 01.03.2016, in O.S.No.262 of
2007. 2. At that stage, the defendants moved I.A.No.318 of 2023 before the learned XIII Additional District Judge at Gajuwaka, with a delay of 2328 days. This application has been pending since March, 2023 when the appeal and the application had been filed. The petitioner has now approached this Court seeking a direction to the Appellate Court to dispose of the said application at the earliest. 3. Notices have been served on the respondents despite which there is no appearance for the respondents. 4. In view of the facts set out above and in view of the submissions made by Sri S. Appadhara Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Civil Revision Petition with a direction to the learned XIII Additional District Judge, Gajuwaka, to dispose of I.A.No.318 of 2023, at the earliest and at any rate not later than six weeks from the date of receipt of this Order. 4
5. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J. BSM
5
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Civil Revision Petition No.1216 of 2025
19-09-2025
BSM