CRM-M-62790 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 228 Vishal Kumar State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Present:- MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, FIR No. 128 34 of IPC at Police Station GRP, District Ludhiana. 2. petition are that the aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of statement recorded by the complainant Samir Khan on the allegations that on 26.08.2022, four unknown youths had opened an assault upon him while he was going from outer signal before Railway Station Ludhiana, towards his house. They had snatched his purse while causing injuries to him and thereafter they had fled away. After registration of FIR, investigation proceedings were initiated. During investigation, 62790-2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Vishal Kumar Versus Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Lakshay Bector, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Swati Batra, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 128 dated 27.08.2022, registered under Section 34 of IPC at Police Station GRP, District Ludhiana. Brief facts of the case relevant for the purpose of disposal of this are that the aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of statement recorded by the complainant Samir Khan on the allegations that on 26.08.2022, four unknown youths had opened an assault upon him while he was going from outer signal before Railway Station Ludhiana, towards his house. They had snatched his purse containing money and identity proofs etc. while causing injuries to him and thereafter they had fled away. After registration of FIR, investigation proceedings were initiated. During investigation, the present petitioner was arrested IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-62790-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.04.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Lakshay Bector, Advocate Ms. Swati Batra, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of 2023 seeking regular bail in case bearing , registered under Sections 397, 379-B, 201 and 34 of IPC at Police Station GRP, District Ludhiana. Brief facts of the case relevant for the purpose of disposal of this are that the aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of statement recorded by the complainant Samir Khan on the allegations that on 26.08.2022, four unknown youths had opened an assault upon him while he was going from outer signal before Railway Station Ludhiana, towards his containing money and identity proofs etc. while causing injuries to him and thereafter they had fled away. After registration of FIR, investigation proceedings were initiated. During was arrested on 11.09.2022. He suffered a -1- 2024 (O&M) 04.04.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent 483 of seeking regular bail in case bearing B, 201 and Brief facts of the case relevant for the purpose of disposal of this are that the aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of the statement recorded by the complainant Samir Khan on the allegations that on 26.08.2022, four unknown youths had opened an assault upon him while he was going from outer signal before Railway Station Ludhiana, towards his containing money and identity proofs etc. while causing injuries to him and thereafter they had fled away. After registration of FIR, investigation proceedings were initiated. During ered a MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.04.05 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-62790 disclosure statement admitting his involvement in the crime and also took the name of co petitioner along with the co aforementioned offences. 3. grounds and it is argued by his counsel that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He is in custody since long. Kumar and Mohd. Sadeem have alre Court, vide orders dated 28.02.2023 and 21.03.2025 passed in CRM 49970-2022 and CRM too deserves useful purpose. 4. by learned to get benefit of bail as chances of his committing similar offences if extended benefit of bail. Therefore, it is urged that the petition does not deserve to be allowed. 5. length and have gone through the record. 6. committed offence of robbery/snatching a wallet containing cash amount of Rs.15,000/ would take time. footing, have already above discussed facts but without meaning to make any comment on the 62790-2024 (O&M) disclosure statement admitting his involvement in the crime and also took the co-accused Mohd. Sadeem. Investigation stands completed and the petitioner along with the co-accused is facing trial for commission of the aforementioned offences. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner on the grounds and it is argued by his counsel that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He is in custody since long. Co- Kumar and Mohd. Sadeem have already been extended benefit of bail Court, vide orders dated 28.02.2023 and 21.03.2025 passed in CRM 2022 and CRM-M-37288-2024, respectively too deserves the same benefit as his further detention would not serve any useful purpose. Hence, it is urged that the petition deserves to be allowed. Status report has been filed by the respondent by learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab that the petitioner to get benefit of bail as there are serious allegations against him. chances of his committing similar offences if extended benefit of bail. Therefore, it is urged that the petition does not deserve to be allowed. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at con length and have gone through the record. The petitioner along with the co committed offence of robbery/snatching a wallet containing cash amount of Rs.15,000/- from the complainant. He is in custody since 11.09.20 would take time. Above named co-accused footing, have already been extended benefit of bail. Keeping in view the above discussed facts but without meaning to make any comment on the disclosure statement admitting his involvement in the crime and also took the . Investigation stands completed and the accused is facing trial for commission of the The present petition has been filed by the petitioner on the grounds and it is argued by his counsel that he has been falsely implicated in -accused Vishal Kumar son of Papli been extended benefit of bail by this Court, vide orders dated 28.02.2023 and 21.03.2025 passed in CRM 2024, respectively. On parity, the petitioner further detention would not serve any that the petition deserves to be allowed. Status report has been filed by the respondent-State. It is argued Advocate General, Punjab that the petitioner is not entitled there are serious allegations against him. There are chances of his committing similar offences if extended benefit of bail. Therefore, it is urged that the petition does not deserve to be allowed. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable The petitioner along with the co-accused is alleged to have committed offence of robbery/snatching a wallet containing cash amount of from the complainant. He is in custody since 11.09.2022. The trial accused, whose cases are on similar been extended benefit of bail. Keeping in view the above discussed facts but without meaning to make any comment on the -2- disclosure statement admitting his involvement in the crime and also took the . Investigation stands completed and the accused is facing trial for commission of the The present petition has been filed by the petitioner on the grounds and it is argued by his counsel that he has been falsely implicated in son of Papli by this Court, vide orders dated 28.02.2023 and 21.03.2025 passed in CRM-M- the petitioner further detention would not serve any State. It is argued is not entitled There are chances of his committing similar offences if extended benefit of bail. siderable accused is alleged to have committed offence of robbery/snatching a wallet containing cash amount of 22. The trial , whose cases are on similar been extended benefit of bail. Keeping in view the above discussed facts but without meaning to make any comment on the MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.04.05 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-62790 merits of the case, I am of the to be released on bail. Hence, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be admitted to bail subject to his furnishing personal as well as surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Cour concerned. 04.04.2025 Waseem Ansari Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 62790-2024 (O&M) merits of the case, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner deserves to be released on bail. Hence, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be admitted to bail subject to his furnishing personal as well as surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Cour . 04.04.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable considered opinion that the petitioner deserves to be released on bail. Hence, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be admitted to bail subject to his furnishing personal as well as surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/CJM/Duty Magistrate (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No -3- considered opinion that the petitioner deserves to be released on bail. Hence, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be admitted to bail subject to his furnishing personal as well as t/CJM/Duty Magistrate MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.04.05 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document