Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10850 (KAR)

KASAPPA S/O RAUTAPPA JAMADAR v. SMT. KASHIBAI W/O AWANNA DONUR AND ORS

RSA/200437/2022 · 2025-06-12

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3036 RSA No. 200437 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.200437 OF 2022 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: KASAPPA S/O RAUTAPPA JAMADAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA - 586 115. …APPELLANT (BY SRI SANJEEVKUMAR C.PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. KASHIBAI W/O AWANNA DONUR, AGE: 84 YEARS, OCC: H.W. WORK, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 2. SMT. SHAYAWWA W/O JETTEPPA MIRGI, AGE: 79 YEARS, OCC: H.W. WORK, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3036 RSA No. 200437 of 2022 3. SMT. ANSUBAI W/O SADAPPA TALWAR, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 4. BASAVARAJ S/O SADAPPA TALWAR AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 5. MAREPPA S/O SADAPPA TALWAR AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 6. ASHOK S/O SADAPPA TALWAR AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 7. SMT. SHANTAWWA W/O RAUTAPPA TALWAR, AGE: 75 YEARS, OCC: H.H.WORK, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 8. SHARNAPPA S/O RAUTAPPA TALWAR AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3036 RSA No. 200437 of 2022 9. MALLIKARJUN S/O RAUTAPPA TALWAR AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 10. DEVAPPA S/O RAUTAPPA TALWAR AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 11. SUBHASH S/O RAUTAPPA TALWAR AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 12. BHAGAPPA S/O REVUTAPPA TALWAR AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 13. GOURAWWA W/O MAREPPA TALWAR AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: H.H.WORK, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 14. MAHADEVAPPA S/O KASAPPA TALWAR AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3036 RSA No. 200437 of 2022 15. SHIVAPPA S/O CHANDRAM TALWAR AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 16. HANAMANT S/O CHANDRAM TALAWAR AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 17. SHRISHAIL S/O CHANDRAM TALWAR AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 18. IRAYYA S/O VEERUPAXAYYA VIBOTIMATH AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: DEVAR-HIPPARAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 115. 19. HANUMANTH S/O KASAPPA DANDIN, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: AKALAWADI VILLAGE, TQ: B.BAGEWADI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA – 586 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI GANESH S. KALABURAGI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI S.B.HANGARKI, ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO R18; NOTICE TO R19 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 10.10.2023 - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3036 RSA No. 200437 of 2022 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.04.2022, PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., SINDAGI AT SINDAGI, IN R.A.NO.45/2020 AND JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.10.2020, PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., SINDAGI IN O.S.NO.348/2013, AND DISMISS THE SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFFS BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT Sri Sanjeevkumar C Patil, learned counsel for appellant has filed a memo for dismissing appeal as withdrawn, signed by appellant. He submits that appellant is also present before Court. Memo is taken on record and appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of dismissal of main appeal, pending I.As. stand disposed off accordingly. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE NJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14 Ct;Vk