Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 108495 (ALL)

RAJVEER SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/40502/2024 · 2025-08-22

Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:146413 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40502 of 2024 Applicant :- Rajveer Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Akhilesh Kumar Singh,G.A. Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J. 1. The case is taken up on mentioning. 2. Short counter affidavit filed on behalf of the opposite party no.2, is taken on record. 3. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri B. P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1. 4. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Case No.4276 of 2020 (State Vs. Rajvir), arising out Case Crime No.470 of 2019, under sections 384, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Highway, District Mathura, alongwith charge sheet No.01 of 2020 dated 22.03.2020 filed in the aforesaid case, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, on the basis of compromise. 5. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a photocopy of the proceeding of compromise verification is already on record as annexure No.S.C.A.-1 to the short counter affidavit, filed today. Learned counsel for the applicant further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicant and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant. 7. In view of the fact that applicant and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromised and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicant. 8. In view of the aforesaid, the the entire proceedings of Case No.4276 of 2020 (State Vs. Rajvir), arising out Case Crime No.470 of 2019, under sections 384, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Highway, District Mathura, alongwith charge sheet No.01 of 2020 dated 22.03.2020 filed in the aforesaid case, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. Order Date :- 23.8.2025 VKG Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad