Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10847 (JHR)

HASIB ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3466/2025 · 2025-04-30

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:12991 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3466 of 2025 ------ Hasib Ansari, aged about 19 years, Son of Wahid Ansari, R/o Vill- Dandar Kala, P.O. and P.S.-Panki, District-Palamu, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Md. Imtiaz Khan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 30-04-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Town P.S. Case No.50 of 2025 corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No.05 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b) (ii) (B) and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused person was involved in illegal possession of Cannabis and on being searched about 8 Kgs of Cannabis were recovered from the joint possession of the petitioner and the co-accused person and from the possession of the petitioner 5.762 Kg of Cannabis was recovered. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-08 of this bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 02.04.2025 in B.A. No.2536 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 29.01.2025 as is evident from para-09 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Act, Palamau in connection with Town P.S. Case No.50 of 2025 corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No.05 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/