KACHNI KUAR ALIAS SACHNI KUAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3102/2025 · 2025-04-21
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10846 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10846 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:11790] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. 3102 of 2025
Kachni Kuar @ Sachni Kuar, aged about 58 years W/o Late Rambriksh @ Briksh Bhuiyan, R/o Village Salaiya, PO & PS- Satbarwa, District- Palamau, State- Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kr. Singh , Adv. For the State
: Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan , Addl. PP For the opp. party no. 2 : Ms. Rakhi Rani, Adv. Ms. Shabana Parween, Adv.
02 / 21.04.2025
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Satbarwa PS Case No. 119/2024 instituted under Sections 190/ 191/ 126/ 127/ 115/ 117/ 118/ 109(1) of BNS and subsequently added U/s 103 (1) of BNS.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was the member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, assaulted Arjun Mehta and his wife and inflicted injury by sharp cutting weapons like sword and gadasa due to which, Arjun Mehta succumbed to injuries while his wife’s four fingers were severed. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and there is specific allegation of assault against Shailendra Bhuiyan, Ravindra Bhuiyan and Pappu Bhuiyan. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a female and she has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 15 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner is in jail custody since
13.01.2025, as mentioned in para 16 of this bail application. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted on regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Palamau. in connection with Satbarwa PS Case No. 119 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case or the victim or their family members in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that she will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-