163 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA BALBIR SINGH SURINDER SINGH DHILLON AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, Punjab HARKESH MANUJA Learned State counsel submits that in pursuance to order passed by the Writ Court, a petition under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Act, 1961 was preferred at the instance of the Gram Panchayat which stands allowed by the Court of DDPO, Sri Muktsar Sahib vide its decision dated 28. necessary compliance shall be done at the earliest. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. 12.05.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: BALBIR SINGH Versus SURINDER SINGH DHILLON AND ORS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA None for the petitioner. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, Punjab **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel submits that in pursuance to order passed by the Writ Court, a petition under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Act, 1961 was preferred at the instance of the Gram Panchayat which stands allowed by the Court of DDPO, Sri Muktsar Sahib vide its decision dated 28. necessary compliance shall be done at the earliest. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. (HARKESH Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5084-2024 Date of Decision: May 12, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, Punjab Learned State counsel submits that in pursuance to order passed by the Writ Court, a petition under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Act, 1961 was preferred at the instance of the Gram Panchayat which stands allowed by the Court of DDPO, Sri Muktsar Sahib vide its decision dated 28.04.2025 and the necessary compliance shall be done at the earliest. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 May 12, 2025 Learned State counsel submits that in pursuance to order passed by the Writ Court, a petition under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Act, 1961 was preferred at the instance of the Gram Panchayat which stands allowed by the Court of .2025 and the In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.05.13 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document