Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 108280 (PNJ)

BIMLA RANI AND ORS v. AMNEET P. KUMAR IAS AND ANR

COCP/5053/2024 · 2025-01-27

Harkesh Manuja

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-5053 167 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Bimla Rani and ors. Amneet P. Kumar, IAS and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present : HARKESH MANUJA, upon an order dated 26.01.2025 and submits that the claim of the petitioners with respect to grant of pay scale of Supervisors stands accepted by the Department. On further instructions from Director, Women and Child Development Department, Haryana, Panc learned State counsel informs that the necessary benefits shall be released in favour of the petitioners within a period of 03 weeks from today. 2. not press the present petition. 3. 4. 5. stand disposed of 6. aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/ 5053-2024 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. Date of Decision: Bimla Rani and ors. VERSUS Amneet P. Kumar, IAS and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present : Ms. Arshi, Advocate for Mr. S.R. Kamboj, Advocate Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel representing upon an order dated 26.01.2025 and submits that the claim of the petitioners with respect to grant of pay scale of Supervisors stands accepted by the Department. On further instructions from Director, Women and Child Development Department, Haryana, Panc learned State counsel informs that the necessary benefits shall be released in favour of the petitioners within a period of 03 weeks from In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if an stand disposed of. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 5053-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:27.01.2025 ...Petitioners Amneet P. Kumar, IAS and another HARKESH MANUJA Mr. S.R. Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioners. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana. Learned counsel representing the respondents relie upon an order dated 26.01.2025 and submits that the claim of the petitioners with respect to grant of pay scale of Supervisors stands accepted by the Department. On further instructions from Director, Women and Child Development Department, Haryana, Panchkuula, learned State counsel informs that the necessary benefits shall be released in favour of the petitioners within a period of 03 weeks from In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does Dismissed as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the respondents relies upon an order dated 26.01.2025 and submits that the claim of the petitioners with respect to grant of pay scale of Supervisors stands accepted by the Department. On further instructions from Director, hkuula, learned State counsel informs that the necessary benefits shall be released in favour of the petitioners within a period of 03 weeks from does y, shall also However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the SANJAY GUPTA 2025.01.27 18:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document COCP-5053 petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application 27.01.2025 sanjay 5053-2024 (O&M) [2] petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application .01.2025 ( Whether speaking/reasoned ? Whether Reportable ? petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE /reasoned ? Yes/No Yes/No petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first SANJAY GUPTA 2025.01.27 18:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document