Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10825 (RAJ)

SIYARAM GAUR v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/4069/2002 · 2025-04-02

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14940] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4069/2002 Siyaram Gaur S/o shri Jhunjhuniya Ram Gaur, Lab Assistant, Government Girls Secondary School, Sarmathura, District Dholpur, R/o Dhanukapura, Tehsil Bari District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through the Director, Primary & Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 2. The District Education Officer (Girls), Dholpur, Rajasthan. 3. Govt. Girls Secondary School Sarmathura, District Dholpur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms.Anjum Parveen Salawat for Ms.Namita Parihar, Dy.GC. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/04/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been made to the impugned orders dated 03.06.2002 and 12.06.2002 by which the petitioner has been reverted back to the original post from the post of Lab Assistant. 2. Aggrieved by the aforesaid orders, the petitioner approached this Court by way of filing the instant writ petition, wherein this Court vide order dated 23.07.2002 stayed the effect and operation of both the orders and the said interim order is still in currency. 3. It has been apprised at Bar by the learned counsel for the respondent-State that pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court on 23.07.2002, the petitioner remained in service and stood retired from the post of Teacher Grade-III on 30.04.2017, after [2025:RJ-JP:14940] (2 of 2) [CW-4069/2002] attaining the age of superannuation. Counsel submits that all the retiral dues have been released to the petitioner including pension by issuing PPO to him on 23.11.2017. Counsel submits that under the changed circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioner to continue with this writ petition and the same be disposed of looking to the subsequent events, which have occurred during pendency of this writ petition. 4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter that the petitioner continued in service by virtue of the interim order dated 23.07.2002 passed by this Court and has retired from the post of Teacher Grade-III on 30.04.2017, after attaining the age of superannuation and has received the retiral dues, no further orders are required to be passed. The instant petition accordingly stands disposed of. 5. The documents referred by the counsel for the respondent- State are ordered to be retained on record. 6. It is made clear that the respondents would not recover any amount, awarded to the petitioner, pursuant to the pendency of this writ petition. 7. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /19