PYARE LAL DUTTA AND ANR v. DR. KAILASH NATH SOOD AND ORS
CMPMO/197/2022 · 2025-09-18
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10825 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10825 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CMPMO No.197 of 2022
Decided on 18th September 2025 Pyare Lal Dutta and another
…Petitioners Versus Dr. Kailash Nath Sood and other
…Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Gautam Sood, Advocate.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to press this petition.
2.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed, so also pending miscellaneous applications, if any.
3.
At this stage, learned counsel for the respondents submits that as in the interregnum, defendant Pyare Lal has died and as there was a stay granted by this Court in these proceedings, now post disposal of these proceedings liberty be granted to the plaintiff to move an appropriate application to
2 bring on record the legal representatives of defendant Pyare Lal.
4.
In terms of the prayer made by learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff, plaintiff is hereby granted liberty to move an appropriate application to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased defendant Pyare Lal.
5.
In case, any such application is filed within a period of three weeks from today, then, the same shall be deemed to have been filed within the period of limitation and the learned Trial Court shall pass appropriate order thereupon.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
September 18, 2025 (Vinod)