Jai Devi vs. State of H.P. & Anr. Cr. Revision No.____of 2025 10.07.2025 Present: Dr. H.R. Jhingta, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Mohinder Zharaick, Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocates General & Mr. Rohit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1/State. None for respondent No.2. Cr.MP(M) No.795 of 2025 Under instructions, it has been submitted by learned Additional Advocate General, that he does not want to contest the application. In such situation, when factual position in application has not been controverted, the application under consideration, is allowed and the delay in filing the accompanying Criminal Revision Petition is ordered to be condoned. Application is, thus, disposed of. Cr. Revision No._______ of 2025 Vide order of the even date, passed in Cr.MP(M) No.795 of 2025, the delay in filing the Criminal Revision Petition has been ordered to be condoned. Be registered. Notice. Mr. Rohit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1/State. Notice be issued to respondent No.2, returnable for 14.08.2025, on taking steps within a period of three days. (Virender Singh) Judge July 10, 2025 (subhash)