Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 108234 (ALL)

VEER BAHADUR PRASAD VARMA v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/18701/2024 · 2025-01-24

Neeraj Tiwari

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18701 of 2024 Petitioner :- Veer Bahadur Prasad Varma Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anwar Ali Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Case called out in revise. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. 2. Heard Sri R. S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel. 3. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to provide interest to the petitioner on the amount of arrears of pension and other retirement amount of the petitioner in the light of the judgement and order dated 18.10.2022 passed by this Court in Writ-A No. 9500 of 2022 (Veer Bahadur Prasad Verma Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others) at an early date, in accordance with law. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 to decide the representation made by the petitioner within a stipulated period, in accordance with law." 4. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that this is the second writ petition filed for the same cause of action which is apparent from the prayer itself. It is also submitted that for compliance of order dated 18.10.2022 passed by this Court in Writ-A No. 9500 of 2022, contempt petition has also been filed, which was dismissed by this Court on 28.08.2024 with the observation that order of Writ Court has been complied by the opposite party. He next submitted that now the petitioner has filed this petition for compliance of order dated 18.10.2022 of this Court which is not maintainable in law. 5. I have considered the submission raised by learned Standing Counsel and perused the record. 6. Contention so raised by learned Standing Counsel is correct, therefore, the petition is dismissed as not maintainable. 7.No order as to costs. Order Date :- 24.1.2025/AKT Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad