2025:UHC:8646 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 25TH SEPTEMBER, 2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1000 of 2025 Nitin Singh .....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate through video conferencing. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Akshay Latwal, Assistant Government Advocate assisted by Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, Brief Holder. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. The present Application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.186 of 2019, registered at Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. 2. Charge-sheet has been filed under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 3. Heard Mr. Rajveer Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the respondent. 4. Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate, has submitted that as per the First Information Report dated 1 2025:UHC:8646 04.05.2019, sale-deeds were executed on the forged documents. The said allegations are totally false. The co-accused executed a registered sale-deed dated 29.11.2014 in favour of the informant and the possession was handed over to him. Applicant was only a witness to the sale-deed dated 29.11.2014. The informant has admitted in his First Information Report that he had obtained possession. Even if there is a dispute, it can at most be a civil dispute. Applicant is a permanent resident of District Haridwar, therefore, there is no possibility of his absconding. Applicant is not a convicted person. Charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. 5. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate, has opposed the anticipatory bail application orally. 6. Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. 7. Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view of the facts 2 2025:UHC:8646 and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present Application, filed for anticipatory bail, is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant Nitin Singh, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/-and two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions:- (i) Applicant shall attend the trial court regularly and he shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment; (ii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case; (iii) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the trial court. 8. It is made clear that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Dt:25.09.2025 Neha 3 NEHA BISHT Digitally signed by NEHA BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038ee7326b08 b2d0e018b01be753f014836d27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB9677068452F32DE6BA 960BFE64D819EE44CA9CCE487B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2025.09.25 18:07:08 +05'30'