Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10813 (UTT)

SHIVAM v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2022/2021 · 2025-04-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2022 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. G.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous, as final report has been submitted in the matter on 28.07.2022 against the petitioners, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.04.2025 SK