Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10810 (KAR)

MR. RAMAKANTH v. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

WP/201528/2025 · 2025-06-05

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2873 WP No. 201528 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.201528 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: MR.RAMAKANTH S/O HANMANTHRAO TOTAD, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT: KESARJAVALAGA, BHALKI TALUK, BIDAR DISTRICT-585401 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.AMIT SAHUKAR, SRI.NARASIMHAN SAMPATH AND SRI.SHIVAKUMAR M., ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BIDAR SUB-DIVISION, BIDAR-585401. 2. PRATHAMIKA KRASHI PATTINA SAHAKAR SANGH NIYAMIT, R/BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KESAR JAWALGA, BHALKI TALUK, BIDAR DISTRICT-585401. 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, BIDAR-585401. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by LUCYGRACE Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2873 WP No. 201528 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER BEARING NO. ¸ÀASÉå/¸À¤©/«-2/zÁªÀ/ SECTION-103/C.R/2024-25 DATED 20.12.2024 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 103(1)(A) OF THE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959 DIRECTING THE TAHSILDAR, HULSOOR TALUK, BIDAR DISTRICT TO TAKE POSSESSION OF THE AGRICULTURAL LANDS BELONGING NOT ONLY TO THE PETITIONER BUT ALSO THAT OF HIS BROTHER NAMELY, UMESH AND HIS MOTHER NAMELY, LAKSHMIBAI AS DETAILED THEREIN AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) The petitioner in the instant writ petition has challenged the order passed under Section 103 (1)(a) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 (for short, ‘the Act’). It is seen that an appeal is provided under Section 105(1)(e) of the Act against such orders. As the petitioner is having an alternative and efficacious remedy, the writ petition is hereby dismissed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority in the manner known to law. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2873 WP No. 201528 of 2025 In case an appeal is filed by the petitioner, the authority concerned shall take into consideration the time spent by the petitioner before this Court in pursuing this writ petition while condoning the delay, if any such application is filed. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VNR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1 CT:SI