Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10808 (KAR)

VIJAYKUMAR S/O BANDEPPA v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANR

WP/202733/2022 · 2025-06-19

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3226 WP No. 202733 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.202733 OF 2022 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: VIJAYKUMAR S/O BANDEPPA, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: EX DRIVER CUM CONDUCTOR 1200 N.E.K.R.T.C. BIDAR, R/O TEGUMPUR POST: MANDAPUR, TQ. AURAD AND DIST. BIDAR-585401. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAIRAJ K. BUKKA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, N.E.K.R.T.C. CENTRAL OFFICE, SARGIE SADANA, KALABURAGI-585104. 2. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, N.E.K.R.T.C. BIDAR DIVISION OFFICE, AT OLD BUS STAND BIDAR, TQ. DIST. BIDAR-585401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DEEPAK V. BARAD, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) Digitally signed by VARSHA N RASALKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3226 WP No. 202733 of 2022 CALL FOR THE RECORDS. B) ISSUE A WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE HON’BLE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE AND PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT AT BIDAR IN KID NO. 10(4)(A)/2/2019 (OLD KID NO.20/2019) DATED 16.09.2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-D C) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ¸ÀASÉå:PÀgÀ¸Á/©Ã«/¹§âA¢/UÉʺÁ/44/2018/3656/2018-19 ¢£ÁAPÀ:23.02.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-C, D) ISSUE A WRIT IN NATURE MANDAMUS OR ANY DIRECTION TO RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 TO THE REINSTATE THE PETITIONER ON DUTY AT WITH CONTINUITY OF SERVICE WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS WITH FULL BACK WAGES. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) The petitioner was appointed as trainee Driver- cum- Conductor by the respondent-Corporation. He was dismissed from service. He raised an Industrial Dispute by way of KID No.10(4)(A)/2/2019. The same came to be dismissed on the ground that he was not a workman. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3226 WP No. 202733 of 2022 2. The case of the petitioner is that this Court in WP No.201468/2022 has held that trainee Driver- cum- Conductor of respondent department is a workman for the purpose of Industrial Disputes Act and the Labour Court erred in holding it otherwise. 3. The learned counsel for respondent is unable to rebut the contention of the petitioner as aforementioned. 4. Under the said circumstances, there is no reason why the benefit of the ratio laid down in W.P.No.201468/2022 should not be granted to the petitioner herein, who is similarly placed to the petitioner in the aforementioned writ petition. 5. Hence the following: ORDER The impugned judgment passed in KID No.10(4)(A)/2/2019, dated 16.09.2021 vide Annexure-D to the writ petition is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded back to the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3226 WP No. 202733 of 2022 Labour Court to decide the dispute in accordance with law. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE SMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38