Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:61261 Court No. - 85 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39331 of 2024 Petitioner :- Mamta Tyagi Respondent :- State of UP and 5 others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avanish Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishna Kant Singh Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner appears to be arising out of the alleged encroachments made by private respondents over a chakmarg and it is urged that the petitioner's right to ingress and egress stands blocked from such encroachments. 3. Prayer made in the writ petition is with regard to disposal of representation moved before the Collector, Hathras. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that such a representation does not lie in view of provisions of Section 26 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (in short 'the Code, 2006') which are statutory proceedings. 5. Considering the material on record and having found force in submissions of learned Standing Counsel, the present writ petition is disposed of with the observation that the petitioner may take recourse to proceedings under Section 26 of the Code, 2006. 6. In case such an application is filed before the competent court within a period of four weeks from today, after ensuring compliance of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 and after arraying proper parties thereto, the concerned case shall be registered on a computerized number and after issuing notice to the alleged encroachers and after calling for reports from the revenue authorities, the said proceedings shall be decided within a period of four months thereafter. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 Jyotsana Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad