Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10799 (KAR)

DEVLIBAI W/O HONNU SINCE DEAD BY LRS 1) UMESH AND ORS v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS

MSA/200112/2024 · 2025-06-20

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3277 MSA No. 200112 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCL SECOND APPEAL NO.200112 OF 2024 (LA) BETWEEN: 1. 1. DEVLIBAI W/O HONNU SINCE DEAD BY LRS UMESH S/O HONNU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 2. GOVIND S/O NIMBU, AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 3. 3a. NARSING S/O POMMU, SINCE DEAD BY LRS INDUBAI W/O NURSING, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, b. PRADIP S/O NARSING AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, ALL ARE R/O: SUGUR(K), TQ: CHITTAPUR, DIST: KALABURAGI. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI SHARANABASAPPA APPANAGOUDA KAREDDY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3277 MSA No. 200112 of 2024 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO REVENUE DEPT, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU. 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, M AND MIP, GULBARGA. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KNNL, GANDORINALA DIVISION, MAHAGAON. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, KNNL, IPC ZONE, KALABURAGI. …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54 (2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL WITH COST AND MODIFIED THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 23.06.2015 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE KALABURAGI IN LACA NO.282/2013 ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT AT RS.3,24,000/- PER ACRE WITH ALL STATUTORY BENEFIT AND WITH PROPORTIONATE COST, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter was passed over and called again, there is no representation. 2. Matter was listed for non-compliance of office objections for 6th time. There is no compliance despite sufficient - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3277 MSA No. 200112 of 2024 opportunity. Same would indicate that appellants are not diligent in pursuing appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE Psg*:List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5