Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103961 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40009 of 2024 Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Jitendra Kumar Yadav,G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit annexing therewith verification order/ report dated 13.05.2025. The same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned counsel for the informant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the Charge Sheet dated 14.06.2024; cognizance and summoning order dated 08.10.2024 as well as entire proceeding of Case No. 92132 of 2024 (State of U.P. Versus Pradeep Kumar) Case Crime No. 66 of 2024, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 308 I.P.C., Police Station Pachokhara, District Firozabad. 4. As per F.I.R. version, applicant committed marpeet, hurled abuses and threatened to kill the informant/complainant as a result informant received injury. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on perusal of injury report, the injuries are simple in nature. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant filed 482 petition to quash the proceedings as both the parties have amicably settled the dispute out of the court. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.02.2025 directed the parties to appear before the court below for verification of compromise. 5. Pursuant to the said order dated 20.02.2025, the parties appeared before the court below and in their presence, after due verification of the parties and contents of the compromise made between them, the court vide order dated 13.05.2025 has passed the verification report and transmitted the same to this Court. A copy of the same is annexed with the application. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant and opposite party no.2 have settled their private and civil dispute through compromise and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicant. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 7. Learned A.G.A. and counsel for the opposite party no. 2 do not dispute the correctness of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. 8. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 9. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of Case No. 92132 of 2024 (State of U.P. Versus Pradeep Kumar) Case Crime No. 66 of 2024, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 308 I.P.C., Police Station Pachokhara, District Firozabad, is hereby quashed. 10. This application under Section 482 CrPC is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad