[2025:RJ-JP:17890] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5036/2025 Shri Kabhu Ram S/o Late Shri Chunni Lal, Aged About 75 Years, R/o Patelo Ki Dhani Pili Kit Talai Amer, Jaipur. ----Petitioner/Defendant Versus 1. Sri Dalu Ram Saini S/o Late Sri Bena Urf Beni Lal, R/o Patelo Ki Dhani Pili Ki Talai Amer Jaipur. 2. Sri Sohan Saini S/o Late Sri Late Sri Bena Urf Beni Lal, R/o Patelo Ki Dhani Pili Ki Talai Amer Jaipur. 3. Sri Babu Lal Saini S/o Late Sri Birda Ram Sharma, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Patelo Ki Dhani Pili Ki Talai Amer Jaipur. ---Defendants/Plaintiffs 4. Gopal Saini S/o late Shri Ganesh R/o Patelo Ki Dhani Pili Ki Talai Amer Tehsil Amer Jaipur. 5. Tehsildar Amer Jaipur 6. Sub-Registrar Officer Amer Jaipur 7. Radhay Shyam Saini S/o late Gopal Lal Saini R/o Patelo Ki Dhani Pili Ki Talai Amer Tehsil Amer Jaipur. 8. Harinarayan Saini S/o late Gopal Lal Saini R/o Patelo Ki Dhani Pili Ki Talai Amer Tehsil Amer Jaipur. 9. Govind Saini S/o late Gopal Lal Saini R/o Patelo Ki Dhani Pili Ki Talai Amer Tehsil Amer Jaipur. 10. Sita Ram Saini S/o late Gopal Lal Saini R/o Patelo Ki Dhani Pili Ki Talai Amer Tehsil Amer Jaipur. 11. Smt. Rampayari D/o late Gopal Lal Saini R/o Patelo Ki Dhani Pili Ki Talai Amer Tehsil Amer Jaipur. 12. Smt. Santosh Devi D/o late Gopal Lal Saini R/o Patelo Ki Dhani Pili Ki Talai Amer Tehsil Amer Jaipur. 13. Smt. Gita Devi D/o late Gopal Lal Saini R/o Patelo Ki Dhani Pili Ki Talai Amer Tehsil Amer Jaipur. ---Performa Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/04/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a suit for Partition, Declaration and Permanent Injunction has been filed in the Court of Sub-Divisional Officer, Amer wherein petitioner is respondent No.2. It is submitted that petitioner has already attained the age of 75 years. Counsel submits that proceedings [2025:RJ-JP:17890] (2 of 2) [CW-5036/2025] before the learned trial court is going at snail’s pace and it appears that there is no immediate prospect of this suit being decided in near future. Counsel thus, prays that in these circumstances, learned trial court may be directed to expedite the proceedings. Learned counsel contends that presently, matter is pending for recording evidence of the plaintiff. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as also considering the age of the petitioner, I deem it just and proper to direct learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Amer to expedite the proceedings and make all endeavors to conclude the trial on or before 30.06.2025. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /67