SARVOTAM SINGH ALIAS LUCKY SANDHU v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
CRWP/12050/2024 · 2025-03-21
Sandeep Moudgil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107935 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107935 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
233 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-12050-2024 DATE OF DECISION: 21.03.2025 SARVOTAM SINGH ALIAS LUCKY SANDHU
...PETITIONER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. GPS Ghuman, Advocate and Mr. Shivraj Daumajra, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Deepender Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ, order, or direction to Respondent No. 2 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner which is in high danger and in the hands of private respondents and to provide adequate security cover on the basis of Representation Dated 26.06.2024 (P-3). Today reply by way of affidavit of Mandhir Singh, PPS, Assistant Inspector General of Police, Security, Punjab has been filed by the State Counsel, the same is taken on record. Copy of the same has been furnished to the counsel opposite. As per the reply filed, there is no threat perception to the petitioner. Anuradha 2025.03.21 08:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-12050-2024 -2- In view of the above, counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press the instant petition as no cause of action survives to pursue the same. Dismissed as not pressed.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 21.03.2025 anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.03.21 08:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document