Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 107926 (ALL)

GEETAM SINGH v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/38741/2024 · 2025-03-06

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:33327-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38741 of 2024 Petitioner :- Geetam Singh Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Faizul Hasan,Mahboob Ahmad Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Sri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 and 4. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated September 17, 2024 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, Agra is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.3.2025 Kuldeep (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad