VIRENDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/39551/2024 · 2025-09-23
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107898 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107898 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 39551 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.
1. The matter is taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Shri Sushil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State. 3. Instant application has been preferred for quashing of the impugned charge sheet no. 36 dated 1.6.2021 in Case Crime No. 105 of 2020, under sections 419, 420, 120-B IPC, P.S. Aung, District Fatehpur and Case No. 503 of 2024. It is also prayed to stay the further proceeding of Case No. 503 of 2024 in Case Crime No. 105 of 2020, under sections 419, 420, 120-B IPC, P.S. Aung, District Fatehpur during pendency of the present application. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that both the parties have amicably settled all the disputes and they have agreed for withdrawal of all cases, including present case, pending between the parties and the same has been verified by the court concerned. A report regarding the same is available on record. It is further submitted that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. Learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for the opposite Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sushil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Santosh Kumar Virendra Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
party no. 2 has no objection. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 7. Both the parties have amicably settled all the disputes and they have agreed for withdrawal of all cases, including present case, pending between the parties and the same has been verified by the court concerned. A report regarding the same is available on record. Considering the law laid down in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 8.
In view of the aforesaid, the entire criminal proceeding of Case No. 503 of 2024 in Case Crime No. 105 of 2020, under sections 419, 420, 120-B IPC, P.S. Aung, District Fatehpur, against applicants, are hereby quashed. 9. The application is allowed. September 24, 2025 SY NA528 No. 39551 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUSHAMA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUSHAMA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad