Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:12208 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 42784 of 2024 Applicant :- Dinesh Alias Jhappa Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Singh Yadav,G.A.,Sanjay Yadav Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Punit Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State-Respondents and perused the record. This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Dinesh Alias Jhappa, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 206 of 2007, under Sections 25 Arms Act, Police Station- Kurra, District- Mainpuri. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused- applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case crime number. The applicant is languishing in jail since 07.10.2024. In the aforesaid case the applicant was granted bail by this Court on 22.09.2008. He submits that after being released on bail the accused-applicant was regularly appearing before the Trial Court, but since 26.02.2024, he was not appearing before the court below. Then the Court below has issued summon and Non Bailable Warrant on 24.09.2024 against the applicant and when he not appeared on several dates the proceedings of Section 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. have been initiated against the applicant. The applicant was arrested on 07.10.2024. Subsequently, the applicant applied for his bail being bail application no. 3571 of 2024 (Dinesh urf Jhappa vs. State of U.P.), but the Additional District Judge, F.T.C.I, Mainpuri, rejected the bail of the accused-applicant on 24.10.2024. The applicant has no criminal antecedent. There is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail, but could not dispute the aforesaid fact. Considering all those facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima-facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Dinesh Alias Jhappa, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. Order Date :- 23.1.2025 Anjali Digitally signed by :- ANJALI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANJALI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad