AAKANKSHA KUMARI AND ANOTHER v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/38349/2024 · 2025-02-23
Vinod Diwakar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107861 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107861 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:26781 Court No. - 76 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38349 of 2024 Petitioner :- Aakanksha Kumari And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Darwari Lal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
1. Shri Arvind Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions, states that on police verification it's revealed that both the petitioners are residing somewhere in the State of Bihar, which does not fall within the territorial limit of Uttar Pradesh, therefore, the relief sought in the instant writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 24.2.2025 Prajapati Justice Vinod Diwakar Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad