- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2967 CRL.P No. 200782 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200782 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. DAVALSAB S/O IMAMASAB DANNUR, AGE:37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. NOW PRESENTLY AT, PUNE-411001(MAHARASHTRA STATE). 2. KHAJABI W/O IMAMASAB DANNUR, AGE:65 YEARS, OCC: H H WORK. 3. IMAMASAB S/O DAVALSAB DANNUR, AGE:75 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE. 4. FATHIMA D/O IMAMASAB DANNUR, AGE:32 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK. 5. BUDDESAB @ LALSAB S/O IMAMASAB DANNUR, AGE:44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, ALL ARE R/O HIREMURAL VILLAGE, TQ. MUDDEBIHAL, DIST. VIJAYAPURA-586212. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI SHIVASHARANA REDDY, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2967 CRL.P No. 200782 of 2024 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH MUDDEBIHAL POLICE STATION, TQ. MUDDEBIHAL, DIST. VIJAYAPURA-586212, R/BY ADDL. SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH-585102. 2. DILSHAD @ SIMA W/O DAVALSAB DANNUR, AGE:26 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. MUDDEBIHAL, INDIRA NAGAR, TQ. MUDDEBIHAL, DIST. VIJAYAPURA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI SHARANABASAPPA K. BABASHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO, A) QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO. 36/2024 OF RESPONDENT MUDDEBIHAL POLICE STATION REGISTERED UNDER THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SECS. 143, 147, 323, 325, 354, 498(A), 504, 506, R/W 149 OF IPC AND U/SEC. 3 AND 4 OF DP ACT AGAINST THE PETITIONER THE JMFC AT MUDDEBIHAL. B) PASS ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDER OR DIRECTIONS AS DEEMED FIT BY THIS HON’BLE COURT UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCE OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2967 CRL.P No. 200782 of 2024 Learned counsel for the petitioners after addressing the arguments at length, files a memo for withdrawal of the petition. Memo reads as under: “That the top noted petition was filed at FIR stage for quashing of proceedings against petitioners. That since petitioners seeks to withdraw the petitioner with a liberty to file after charge-sheet, hence with such liberty reserved, petitioners be permitted to withdraw the petition in the interest of justice.” Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SRT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25 CT:PK