FAROZ AHMAD MIR v. SMITHA SETHI AND ORS. (SIDCO / INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE)
CCP(S)/534/2022 · 2025-10-29
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10785 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10785 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
01. The instant contempt petition arises out of an Order dated 3rd June, 2022, passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 1179/2022, whereby the respondents were
directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for allotment of land measuring 12 Kanals in his favour for establishment of Cold Storage Unit under the name and style of WS Snow Valley Integrated Cold Chain at Industrial Estate Aglar, Shopian within a period of four weeks. Sr. No.41 Regular List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) No. 534/2022 in WP(C) No. 1179/2022 Feroz Ahmad Mir …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Salheen Manzoor, Adv, Vs. Smitha Sethi and Ors. ...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Wasim Gul, GA.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 29.10.2025
02. Since the aforesaid order has not been complied with by the respondents in its letter and spirit, the petitioner came forward with the instant contempt petition for seeking its implementation.
03. At this stage, Mr. Wasim Gul, learned GA, appearing for the respondents produced a copy of detailed consideration order dated 28th October, 2025, whereby the claim of the petitioner was examined and accordingly rejected in view of the Industrial Policy 2021-30 making it clear that mere issuance of Land Availability Certificate under earlier Policy 2016 does not create any interest or right in favour of the petitioner. A copy of aforesaid consideration order produced by learned counsel for the respondents is taken on record.
04. This Court is of the view that the order, against which, the instant contempt petition has been preferred, stands complied with by the respondents. Accordingly, the proceedings in the contempt petition are closed leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid consideration order by way of appropriate proceedings admissible under law.
05. Rule, if any framed, shall stand discharged.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 29.10.2025
“Shamim Dar”