Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 107830 (ALL)

DINESH CHANDRA PANDEY v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/38347/2024 · 2025-04-15

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38347 of 2024 Petitioner :- Dinesh Chandra Pandey Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Bhusan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Satyam Singh,Vaibhav Tripathi Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 02.04.2025, compliance affidavit has been filed by Sri Vaibhav Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.2 today in the Court, is taken on record. 3. It is stated in the aforesaid affidavit that in compliance of the aforesaid order, a letter dated 09.04.2025 was written to the petitioner, which was received by him on 11.04.2025 and thereafter petitioner submitted his joining report on the same day. Further in para 7 of the compliance affidavit, it is stated that Cheque No. 076791 dated 09.04.2025 of Rs. 10,04137/- of Bank of Maharashtra Branch Govind Nadgar, Kanpur in favour of Dinesh Chandra Pandey placed before this Court and same is handed over to Sri Santosh Kumar Chaubey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ravi Bhushan, Advocate, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, during the course of the day. 4. After some arguments, prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that relief as sought for, has already been granted, hence the present is dismissed as having become infructuous. 5. The present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 T.S. Digitally signed by :- TRIBHUWAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad