ATMARAM NANASUKALE L.RS. MANIK AND OTHERS v. BOLAJI KUNDLIK GAIKWAD(DIED)L.RS.UTTAM B.GAIKWAD L.RS. GAUTAM
CA/4307/2025 · 2025-09-23
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10783 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10783 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
18 CA 4307 OF 2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 18 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4307 OF 2025 IN SA/30/1999 ATMARAM NANASUKALE L.RS. MANIK AND OTHERS VERSUS BOLAJI KUNDLIK GAIKWAD(DIED)L.RS.UTTAM B.GAIKWAD L.RS. GAUTAM ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. .R.Tapse h/f Mr. Narwadkar Mrigesh D. Advocate for Respondents : Mr. A.M. Humbe ... CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 23.09.2025 PER COURT : Learned advocate Mr. Humbe was appearing for deceased respondent but he does not have any instructions to represent his legal heirs.
2. The application is for condonation of delay and restoration of the second appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, I am inclined to allow the same.
3. The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and ‘C’ on condition that the applicants furnish fresh and correct address of the heirs of respondent.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) mkd/- 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:26432