Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 107799 (PNJ)

JYOTI v. THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CAHNDIGARH BENCH AND OTHERS

CWP/35305/2024 · 2025-08-27

Harsimran Singh Sethi, Vikas Suri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 240 CWP-35305-2024 Date of Decision: 27.08.2025 Jyoti ....Petitioner Versus Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI ---- Present: Petitioner in person. Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate and Mr. Aseem Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent – KVS. **** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. On the last date of hearing, the following order was passed by this Court:- “The petitioner is a single lady, who has been transferred from Punjab to Madhya Pradesh and being an obedient worker, she has also joined there, but keeping in view certain facts and the problems which she is being by her, especially taking care of her old father, who is staying/residing in Haryana, a request is being made by the Court to explore the feasibility of posting her near Haryana. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 is requested to forward this request to the authorities concerned for sympathetic consideration. Let the respondent(s) revert back by 27.08.2025.” VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.08.29 16:54 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC CWP-35305-2024 -2- 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent – Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan submits that though, the post of Principal is a All India Cadre post but, as a special case keeping in view the exigencies and the order passed by this Court, a decision has been taken by the competent authority on 26.08.2025 and the petitioner has been posted at Kendriya Vidyalaya, Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar (Haryana) wherein, she has been directed to report immediately. 3. The petitioner, who appears in person, submits that keeping in view the sympathetic view taken, she is grateful to the institution and the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. It is noted that the present order has been passed under special circumstances, and the same will not be treated as a precedent. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) August 27, 2025 JUDGE Varinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.08.29 16:54 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC