Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 107797 (PNJ)

LACHHMAN SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

CRM-M/62234/2024 · 2025-08-21

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 309-1 CRM-M-62234-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.08.2025 Lachhman Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA **** Present: Mr. Gulveer Kaur, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. Durgesh Garg, AAG, Punjab. Ms. Gurleen Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Mitul Singh Rana, Advocate for the respondent No.2. MANISHA BATRA , J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of cross case in DDR No.57 dated 18.08.2022, in case bearing FIR No.134 dated 17.08.2022, registered under Sections 323, 324, 506, 148, 149, at Police Station Dasuya, Hoshiarpur and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 10.07.2023 (Annexure P-2). 2 . This Court vide order dated 15.07.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dasuya, and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Judge has NISHA 2025.09.02 15.41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-62234-2024 (O&M) -2- submitted report dated 08.08.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and DDR No.57 dated 18.08.2022, in case bearing FIR No.134 dated 17.08.2022, registered under Sections 323, 324, 506, 148, 149, at Police Station Dasuya, Hoshiarpur and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 10.07.2023 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE August 21, 2025 Nisha-1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No NISHA 2025.09.02 15.41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document