SMT ARADHANA @ ROOPA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS
NA528/39352/2024 · 2025-08-12
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107795 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107795 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:137752 Court No. - 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 39352 of 2024 Applicant :- Smt Aradhana @ Roopa Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar,Santosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Shri Vimal Kumar Maurya, Advocate holding brief of Shri Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to issue a direction to the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj to decide the complaint case No. 39/XII of 2024, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Puramufti, District Prayagraj within stipulated period. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. The instant application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Office shall return the certified copy of the documents to the
learned counsel for the applicant, after retaining a xerox of the same.
Order Date :- 13.8.2025 T. Sinha Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad