Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10776 (CHH)

TEEJRAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1099/2025 · 2025-02-28

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:9980 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1099 of 2025 1 - Teejram S/o Chandram Kashyap Aged About 58 Years Caste Kurmi R/o Village Pendri Tahsil Hasaud District - Sakti (C.G.) 2 - Mohitram S/o Chandram Kashyap Aged About 55 Years Caste Kurmi R/o Village Pendri Tahsil Hasaud District - Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Atal Nagar Nava Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Sakti District - Sakti (C.G.) 3 - Tahsildar Hasaud Tahsil Hasaud District - Sakti (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.03.03 21:02:52 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Shri Tarun Dansena, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 28.02.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner who is the owner of the land bearing khasra no. 333 0.94 acres situated at village Pendri Tehsil Hasaud District Sakti (C.G.) preferred this present writ petition seeking a direction towards the Tehsildar to decide the application filed by the petitioner for correction on the revenue record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the dispute between the petitioner as well as one Hembai has been decided by the order of the SDO dated 19.06.2024 and in compliance to the said order, the petitioner has approached the Tehsildar for necessary correction in the revenue record against the land which is owned by the petitioner. The said application has been moved by the petitioner on 15.09.2024, however the respondent/Tehsildar has not taken any steps to decide the application for necessary correction in the revenue record. 3. Learned counsel for the State on instruction submit that if the application dated 15.09.2024 is still pending before the respondent Tehsildar, the same shall be decided within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard both the parties and perused the application. 5. As the application is pending since the month of September, 2024, the Tehsildar shall take necessary step and pass appropriate order 3 in accordance with law within a period of 45 days. The petitioner is at liberty to apprise the respondent Tehsildar about the order of this Court. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib