RANGASAMY SATHYANANDAM v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/2683/2025 · 2025-03-26
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10775 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10775 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010122812025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2683/2025 Between: Rangasamy Sathyanandam and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. PUVVALA SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The court made the following Order:
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the BNSS, has been filed by the petitioners/A1 and A2, seeking regular bail, in Crime No.216 of 2024 of Kirlampudi Police Station, Kakinada District.
2. A case has been registered against the petitioners herein for the offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) read with 8(c) of the NDPS Act.
3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, on 25.11.2024, on receipt of credible information, the Sub-Inspector of police along with his staff and mediators rushed to NH-16 road, somavaram village, kirlampudi and found the accused in possession of
2
163.545Kgs of Ganja. The contraband along with other material was seized under the cover of mediators report.
4. Heard. Perused the record.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners have been in judicial custody from 25.11.2024 and prays to grant bail to the petitioners herein.
6. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor opposed to grant bail on the ground that contraband allegedly involved in the present crime is 163.545Kgs of Ganja, which is a commercial quantity. He further submits that six criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioners.
7. In view of the gravity of offence and involvement of huge quantity of ganja and in view of the bar contained under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
_____________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J 26.03.2025 ASR
3
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Criminal Petition No.2683 of 2025
Dated: 26.03.2025
ASR