VINOD SHARMA AND 10 OTHERS v. State of UP AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/38537/2024 · 2025-02-18
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, Ashwani Kumar Mishra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107749 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107749 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:24394-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38537 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vinod Sharma And 10 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Shanker Srivastava,Nikhil Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
1. This is a misconceived petition.
2. Petitioners want certain sugarcane purchase centres to be allocated to a private sugar mill.
3. Admittedly, reservation and assignment of sugarcane purchase centre is made by the Cane Commissioner in accordance with the provisions contained in U. P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953. If any person is aggrieved by such reservation or assignment orders, remedy of appeal is available in the Statute. Without laying challenge to the reservation or assignment orders no writ can be filed for acceptance of the proposal or for allocation of specified cane purchase centre to a private sugar mill.
4. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Dismissal of this petition, however, will not preclude the persons aggrieved from challenging reservation or assignment orders before the competent forum. Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Ashok Kr. Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad