EHSAN ANSARI @ IHSHAN AHMAD v. State of U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
A482/39768/2024 · 2025-07-15
Anish Kumar Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107743 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107743 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114300 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ***** (SL No.3) Court No. - 78 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39768 of 2024 Applicant :- Ehsan Ansari @ Ihshan Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Mishra,Vijyeta Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
1. Heard Sri Vijyeta Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Vijay Rathi, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with following prayer:
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the entire proceeding of Maintenance Case No. 172 of 2024 (Fatima Parveen and another Vs. Ehsan Ansari) under section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station- Lar, District- Deoria, pending in the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Deoria."
3. The brief facts of the case are that the opposite parties no.2 and 3 are the wife and son of the applicant herein. The same has not been disputed by the applicant. The opposite parties no.2 and 3 had filed an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C., seeking maintenance at the rate of Rs. 15,000/- per month and Rs. 10,000/- respectively. In the said proceedings notice was issued to the applicant herein for appearance. After receipt of the notice the instant application has been filed by the applicant. 4. In view thereof, it is admitted fact that the opposite parties no.2 and 3 are the wife and son of the applicant and only notice has been issued to the applicant in the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. therefore, this Court do not find any good ground to entertain the instant application as there is no adverse order passed to the applicant herein so far. Therefore, the instant application is dismissed. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that if an opportunity is granted to the parties there is possibility for settlement of matrimonial dispute between them. 6. In view thereof, it is directed if such a prayer is made by the applicant before the
trial court concerned, the same should be considered looking at the bona fide of the prayer so made by the applicant before the trial court.
Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Shubham Arya (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad