Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 107735 (PNJ)

JAGPREET SINGH ALIAS JAGGA v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/61525/2024 · 2025-05-08

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-61525-2024 & CRM-M-61584-2024 - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 211 Date of decision: 08.05.2025 1. CRM-M-61525-2024 JAGPREET SINGH ALIAS JAGGA ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent 2. CRM-M-61584-2024 HARDEEP SINGH ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present : Mr. G.S.Saini, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Jasdeep Singh, DAG, Punjab. SANJAY VASHISTH. J.(Oral) 1. Jagpreet Singh @ Jagga and Hardeep Singh have filed the present petitions under Section 482 of BNSS, seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 0037 dated 01.07.2024, under Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Talwandi Bhai, District Ferozepur 2. Counsel for both the petitioners informs that after filing of the instant petitions before this Court, both the petitioners have been arrested, therefore, petitions be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.05.10 02:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CRM-M-61525-2024 & CRM-M-61584-2024 - 2- 3. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners, both the anticipatory bail petitions are hereby disposed of, same being rendered infructous. 4. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of the connected case. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 08.05.2025 JUDGE amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.05.10 02:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment