Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 107733 (ALL)

RAMU @ PARSOTTAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 13 OTHERS

WRIC/38138/2024 · 2025-01-22

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:11683 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38138 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ramu @ Parsottam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 13 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- opposite parties no.1 and 2 and Sri Pradeep Singh, counsel for the Gram Sabha i.e. opposite party no.3. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to opposite parties no.4 to 14 is dispensed with. 3. The present petition has been filed with a limited prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing opposite party no.2 to decide Case No.112/1011, Computerised Case No.T20151653021325 of 2015, Ramu @ Parsottam Vs. Sumer and others, under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a stipulated period. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the power to mutate on the basis of succession flows from under Section 33 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and is to be exercised in the manner prescribed by Section 35. It is further guided by Rule 34 (7) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, which reads as under:- "Rule 34. Issue of Proclamation [Section 35(1)]. (1) x x x x (2) x x x x (3) x x x x (4) x x x x (5) x x x x (6) x x x x (7) The Tahsildar shall make an endeavour to decide the undisputed case of mutation within the period of 45 days from the date of the registration of the case and the disputed case of mutation within the period of 90 days and if the proceeding is not concluded within such period the reason for the same shall be recorded. (8) x x x x" 5. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel does not dispute the aforesaid legal position. 6. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to opposite party no.2 to decide the aforesaid case pending before him within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, after hearing all parties concerned. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 22.1.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad