Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10773 (CHH)

MR. NEETIN VINAYAK RAO GHUMDE v. M/S CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED

WP227/199/2023 · 2025-07-07

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 199 of 2023 1 - Mr. Neetin Vinayak Rao Ghumde S/o Shri Vinayak Rao Ghumde Aged About 39 Years Occupation Contractor, R/o Flat No.-1/102, Rishabh Prime City, Potiyakala, Padmanabhpur, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - M/s Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Company Limited Having It Branch Office At Through Branch Manager, Branch Office At Shop No. 506- 509, Fifth Floor, National Corporate Park, G.E.Road, Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001 (Head Office M/s Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Company Limited, Represented By Its Authorized Signatory, Dara House No. /2, N.S.C. Bose Road Parrys, Chennai-290001) 2 - Sole Arbitrator Shri A.M. Thakur Advocate Office At Flat No. 107, V-3, Cascade, Behind-Colours Mall, Pachpedi Naka, Dhamtari Road, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - M/s Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Company Limited Having Its Local Branch Office At Through Branch Manager, Shop No. 207 To 211, 1st Floor R K Heights, Station Road, In Front Of Kewal Bhawan, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh 491001 ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Pratibha Sahu, Advocate holding the brief of of Mr. Arjit Tiwari, Advocate For respondent : Mr. Swayam Tehanguria, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 08.07.2025 1. Ms. Sahu, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pleads no instruction. 2. Taking into consideration the submission made by Ms. Sahu, the present petition is dismissed in want of instruction. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha REKHA SINGH Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH