MANISHA BHARDWAJ v. HIMMAT SINGH , CHAIRMAN, HSSC AND ANR
COCP/5139/2024 · 2025-02-03
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107724 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107724 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
172
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA MANISHA BHARDWAJ
HIMMAT SINGH , CHAIRMAN, HSSC AND ANR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present: Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj,
Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA Learned State counsel relies upon a communication dated 03.02.2025 issued from the Office of Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission to submit that the name of the petitioner has been recommended for the post of Computer Instructor and he further on instructions submits that the petitioner shall be made to join within two weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 03.02.2025 Tejwinder
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:
MANISHA BHARDWAJ
Versus HIMMAT SINGH , CHAIRMAN, HSSC AND ANR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate for the Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel relies upon a communication dated 03.02.2025 issued from the Office of Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission to submit that the name of the petitioner has been recommended for the post of Computer Instructor and he further on instructions submits that the petitioner shall be made to join within two weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing application. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5139-2024 Date of Decision: February 03, 2025
........Petitioner HIMMAT SINGH , CHAIRMAN, HSSC AND ANR .....Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.
Learned State counsel relies upon a communication dated 03.02.2025 issued from the Office of Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission to submit that the name of the petitioner has been recommended for the post of Computer Instructor and he further on instructions submits that the petitioner shall be made to join within two In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing
(HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No
2024 February 03, 2025 Learned State counsel relies upon a communication dated 03.02.2025 issued from the Office of Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission to submit that the name of the petitioner has been recommended for the post of Computer Instructor and he further on instructions submits that the petitioner shall be made to join within two In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.02.04 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document