Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 107705 (PNJ)

ABHISHEK AND ANR v. SHANDER SHEKHAR KHARE AND ORS

COCP/5020/2024 · 2025-01-23

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

194 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ABHISHEK AND ANR SHANDER SHEKHAR KHARE AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Abhishek Goyal, Ms. Vasund Mr. Pravindra Singh Chauhan, Advocate for respondents. HARKESH MANUJA Compliance report by way of an affidavit of Mr. G Estate Officer, HSVP respondents, the Copy supplied. Learned counsel 09.01.2024 passed in CWP In v does not press the present petition, however, with liberty to avail his appropriate remedies in accordance with law Dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. Rule discharged. 23.01.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decis ABHISHEK AND ANR Versus SHANDER SHEKHAR KHARE AND ORS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Abhishek Goyal, Advocate for the Ms. Vasundhra Asija Bhandari, Advocate for Mr. Pravindra Singh Chauhan, Advocate for respondents. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) ompliance report by way of an affidavit of Mr. G Estate Officer, HSVP, Faridabad has been filed on behalf of the same is taken on record. Copy supplied. Learned counsel for respondents 09.01.2024 passed in CWP-29534-2017 has now been complied with. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, with liberty to avail his appropriate remedies in accordance with law Dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. Rule discharged. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5020-2024 Date of Decision: January 23, 2025 ........Petitioners .......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioners. hra Asija Bhandari, Advocate for Mr. Pravindra Singh Chauhan, Advocate for respondents. ompliance report by way of an affidavit of Mr. Gauri Midha, as been filed on behalf of for respondents submits that order dated 2017 has now been complied with. iew of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition, however, with liberty to avail his appropriate remedies in accordance with law Dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 January 23, 2025 uri Midha, as been filed on behalf of submits that order dated s does not press the present petition, however, with liberty to avail his TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.24 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document