Sr. No.07 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR (Through virtual mode) Case: CM (M ) No. 518/2025 CM No. 7720/2025 Caveat No. 2943/2025 Caveat No. 2098/2025 Mohammad Shafi Parray …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Malik Mushtaq, Advocate. V/s Fayaz Ahmad Mir …. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Syed Hamid, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE ORDER 29.12.2025 When the question of maintainability was put to learned counsel for the petitioner, he submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to the remedy as may be available under law. He further submits that the appeal would be barred by limitation and requests that the limitation period should not come in the way of filing the appeal. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to the remedy as may be available under law. However, the time spent in filing this petition shall be excluded from the period of limitation. (VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE Jammu 29.12.2025 Renu