Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39054-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38809 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shanti Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,Ravi Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Narendra Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel holding brief of Sri N.K. Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.3. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated August 21, 2024 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising her grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.3 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.3/Executive Engineer, PUVVNL, Vidyut Vitran Khand Chayal, Kaushambi is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Kuldeep (Kshitij Shailendra, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad