[2025:RJ-JP:19927-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal (Writs) No. 244/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2845/2025 1. Pranayas Mandir Shri Faloudi Mata Ji Maharaj Trust, Kherabad, Ramganjmandi, District Kota (Raj.) Through Its President Manak Chand Acholia Aged 87 Years, S/o - Madan Lal, R/o-Near Purani Tehsil Kasar Gali, Jhalrapatan City, Jhalawar Presently Trustee And President At Mandir Shri Falaudi Mataji Maharaj Trust, Khairabad Tehsil Ramganj Mandi District, Kota. 2. Ghanshyam Gupta S/o Manak Chand Acholia, Aged About 66 Years, R/o-Near Purani Tehsil Kasar Gali, Jhalrapatan City, Jhalawar Presently Trustee At Mandir Shri Falaudi Mataji Maharaj Trust, Khairabad Tehsil Ramganj Mandi District, Kota. ----Appellants Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through, Commissioner, Devasthan Department, 2, Meera Marg, Panchvati, Udaipur, Rajasthan, Udaipur Campus, Udaipur. 2. Assistant Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Ajmer, Devsthaan Vibhaag, Madrampura, Ajmer-01 3. Asst. Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Beena Baaj Building, Khai Road, Ladpura, Kota 4. Girish Kumar Bachani, S/o M L Bachani, Asst. Commissioner Devasthan, Madrampura, Ajmer 5. Madan Lal S/o Lt Kanwar Lal Gupta, Resident Of Plot No. 69 Shastri Nagar Dadabadi, Kota (Raj.) 6. Bhanwar Lal S/o Shiv Prasad Gupta, Age Not Known Secretary, Mandir Shri Falaudi Mataji Maharaj Samiti, Karadabad, Kota. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Dr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT [2025:RJ-JP:19927-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-244/2025] Judgment 12/05/2025 1. Heard. 2. The appeal arises out of order dated 24.02.2025, which decided nothing but only issued notice, made returnable by dasti mode. 3. What has brought the appellant to this Appellate Court is that the appellant’s application for stay has remained pending without consideration. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that though the case has been listed on number of occasions, the case could not reach. 5. At this stage, except giving liberty to mention the case for hearing on stay application on earlier date, no further observations can be made. 6. In case, the appellant mentions the matter before the learned Single Judge, we would request learned Single Judge to decide the stay application one way or the other within a period of three weeks, if possible. 7. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed off. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT - Diksha/22